- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Red blood cell distribution width is a short-term mortality predictor in middle-aged and older adults with hip fracture
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 26, Article number: 261 (2025)
Abstract
Objective
To study the relationship between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and short-term mortality of hip fracture in middle-aged and older adults.
Methods
A retrospective cohort of electronic medical records at a single hospital over a 2-year period between 2020 and 2021. We received the records of 233 patients aged > 50 years who suffered from hip fracture. the clinical data including patients demographics, comorbidities at the time of admission, type of surgery, blood examination, 3-months mortality, 6-months mortality and 1-year mortality. the relationship between RDW and short-term mortality of hip fracture were analyzed. the cohort was then divided into two groups based on their RDW levels at the time of admission: low (RDW < 13.6%) and high (RDW ≥ 13.6%).
Results
Results the mean age was 78.03 ± 12.09 years; 64.81% were woman. At admission, 80 patients (34.33%) had high RDW levels and 153 patients (65.67%) had low RDW levels. there were no statistically significant differences between the groups with regard to sex, type of operation, duration of surgery and hospitalization length. Patients with high RDW had more comorbidities when compared to patients with low RDW levels (p < 0.05). All-cause mortality was higher for patients with high RDW levels, at 3 months (p < 0.05), 6 months (p < 0.05), and 12 months (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
RDW is significantly related with short-term mortality in hip fracture. The higher RDW, the higher risk of mortality.
Introduction
Osteoporosis is a systemic metabolic disease characterized by low bone mass and microstructural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to increased bone fragility and susceptibility to fractures [1]. Hip fracture is one of the most serious consequences of osteoporosis [2, 3]. With the increasing aging population in China, the incidence of hip fracture is on the rise [4]. Due to the fact that elderly patients often have multiple comorbidities before injury, patients with hip fracture have a high rate of disability and mortality [5, 6]. It has been reported that the 6-month mortality rate for hip fractures is 6.7-13.2% [7,8,9], and the one-year mortality rate is 10.0-22.8% [10,11,12,13]. Age, gender, comorbidities, type of fracture, ability of daily living before injury, cardiovascular disease or chronic respiratory disease before injury, surgical treatment, time from injury to hospitalization, time from surgery to operation, and pulmonary infection during hospitalization have been considered as the risk factors for death of hip fracture. However, using these models is untimely and imprecise. Therefore, it is important to identify biomarkers related to the mortality risk of hip fractures in clinical practice.
RDW is a parameter that reflects the heterogeneity of red blood cell volume in peripheral blood and can objectively reflect the degree of inequality in red blood cell size [14]. RDW is timely and inexpensive. RDW, calculated as a percentage, is derived from the standard deviation of red blood cell (RBC) sizes divided by the mean corpuscular volume (MCV). It is a simple process to acquire RDW values from a complete blood count (CBC) analysis [15, 16]. Typically, the average volume of RBCs in humans falls between 80 and 100 femtoliters (fL), with RDW values typically ranging from 12 to 15%; however, these ranges can differ based on the specific testing laboratory and the demographic being tested [17, 18].
Recent studies have shown that RDW is a predictor of mortality risk in various internal diseases, such as coronary heart disease, heart failure, and pulmonary infections [14, 19, 20]. Most patients with hip fractures have complicating diseases, which can result in an increased RDW value. Therefore, can RDW be used as a predictor of mortality risk in patients with hip fractures? This article aims to explore the relationship between RDW and the short-term mortality rate of hip fractures.
Materials and methods
Study population
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Jinjiang Municipal Hospital, Fujian, China. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. A total of 287 patients were recruited from the Department of Orthopaedics, Jinjiang Municipal Hospital, between January 2020 and December 2021.
Inclusion criteria
A total of 287 patients with hip fractures who visited the Department of Orthopaedics, Jinjiang Municipal Hospital were enrolled. Of these, 54 patients were excluded, resulting in a final sample of 233 patients. Figure 1 presents a flow diagram of the study cohort.
The previously described inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) patients with hip fractures proven via imaging examination, (b) all patients suffered from minor injuries, (c) the minimum age of the patients was 50 years, (d) blood tests were collected after admission, (e) all patients had complete hospitalization data, including laboratory, imaging and follow-up data; (f) the patients were selected from inpatients.
Biochemical assays and data collected
Upon admission of the patients, venous blood samples were obtained to assess specific laboratory values. The RDW was determined using an automated hematology analyzer (SYSMEX XE-5000, Japan), with a reference interval of 11–16%.
Medical examinations were performed for all patients at the Jinjiang Municipal Hospital. Clinical and demographic information was obtained from the medical data platform of the hospital. These data included information on age, sex, comorbidities, blood pressure, type of operation, duration of surgery and hospitalization length, blood examination, date of diagnosis and date of death. Comorbidities included cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease and other medical diseases. Cardiovascular disease included coronary heart disease, heart failure, myocardial infarction. Cerebrovascular disease included cerebral infarction, sequelae of stroke, Parkinson’s syndrome. Chronic respiratory disease included pneumonia, chronic bronchitis, COPD. Other medical diseases included anemia, and renal insufficiency. During the follow-up period, the patients were interviewed through telephone every three months until death events occurred. Survival status, disease progression and date of death were recorded. The last follow-up was conducted on June 8, 2023.
Statistical analysis
Data were analysed using IBM SPSS 26.0. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Chi-square tests were performed to compare categorical variables between groups. Independent sample t-tests were used to compared continuous variables between groups. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of RDW for 12-month mortality after surgery. In addition, the optimal cut-off values were calculated. The optimal cut-off values for the ROC curves were established using the Youden index. Cox proportional hazard models were used to obtain hazard ratios (HRs). Patient clinical endpoints were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant difference.
Results
During the study period, 287 patients were treated at our hospital, of these, 54 patients did not meet the study’s inclusion criteria. Of the 233 patients included in this analysis, 19 (7.51%), 30 (11.86%) and 40 (15.81%) died within 3 months, 6 months and 12 months, respectively.
Baseline demographics and characteristics of patients by survival at 12 months
Of all the 233 patients, we divided them into two groups: died at 12 months and survived at 12 months. Age, RDW, hypertension and comobidities of subjects were significant difference between the groups. The distribution of the types of treatment did not differ between the groups (p = 0.148). There were no significant difference between the groups as regards duration of surgery, hospitalization length, pneumonia, type 2 diabetic mellitus (DM2), sex, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), white blood cell (WBC), hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), glutalanine transferase (ALT), uric acid, blood calcium, serum phosphorus, total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (p > 0.05). Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1.
The ROC curve for RDW in predicting mortality
Data from 233 patients were included in the final analysis. An ROC curve analysis was conducted to determine the predictive value of RDW in predicting mortality at 12 months after surgery. The optimal cut-off value was 13.6%, with relatively high sensitivity and specificity (AUC = 0.653, 95% CI, 0.561–0.744, p = 0Fig. Fig. 2).
Patient characteristics and demographics by low RDW (< 13.6%) and high RDW (≥ 13.6%)
Based on the ROC curve, the cut-off value of the RDW is 13.6%. The patients were divided into the RDW < 13.6% and RDW ≥ 13.6% groups. Of the 233 patients included in this analysis, 80 patients (34.33%) had high RDW levels and 153 patients (65.67%) had low RDW levels. The mortality of RDW ≥ 13.6% groups was significant higher than the RDW < 13.6% groups (p < 0.05). The cohort’s mean ages 78.03 ± 12.09 years, with no significant difference between two groups (p > 0.05). The RDW ≥ 13.6% groups had more comorbidities than the RDW < 13.6% groups (p < 0.05). The rate of subjects underlying hypertension, pneumonia and DM2 were higher in the RDW ≥ 13.6% groups. The albumin of RDW ≥ 13.6% groups was higher. There were not significant difference between the groups regarding sex, SBP, DBP, WBC, hemoglobin, ALP, ALT, uric acid, blood calcium, serum phosphorus, TC, TG, HDL, LDL (p > 0.05). Patient characteristics are presented in Table 2.
RDW and mortality
Of the 233 patients included in this analysis, 19 (7.51%), 30 (11.86%) and 40 (15.81%) died within 3 months, 6 months and 12 months, respectively. The RDW were higher in the death group than in the survival group. The mortality of RDW ≥ 13.6% groups was significant higher than the RDW<13.6% groups(p < 0.05). Among 233 patients, the association remained significant for 3-month [RR 2.889, 95% CI: (1.112–7.507), p = 0.024], 6-month [RR 2.906, 95% CI: (1.331–6.345), p = 0.006] and 12-month [RR 2.217, 95% CI: (1.111–4.422), p = 0.022] mortality, respectively. Mortality rates for two groups are presented in Table 2; Fig. 3.
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis
Based on the RDW, the patients divided into the RDW<13.6% and RDW ≥ 13.6% groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves shows that the RDW ≥ 13.6% groups have a higher mortality than the RDW < 13.6% groups (p = 0.017) (Fig. 4).
Discussion
Hip fractures are a common injury among elderly individuals, and they are often associated with high mortality rates. Some scholars have reported that the 6-month mortality rate of elderly patients with hip fracture is 6.7-13.2% [7,8,9]. The 1-year mortality rate is 10.0-22.8% [10,11,12,13]. This is similar to the results of our study, where the 3-month mortality was 7.51%, 6-month mortality was 11.86% and the 1-year mortality was 15.81%. Risk factors associated with hip fractures death include: age, sex, number of complicating diseases, fracture type, cognitive status, self-care ability before injury, cardiovascular disease or chronic respiratory disease before injury and pulmonary infection during hospitalization [21].
As a result, researchers are exploring new ways to predict mortality risk in these patients. One promising predictive marker is RDW, an inexpensive and simple blood test that measures the range of sizes of red blood cells in the circulation.
In this study, we found that higher RDW values were associated with increased mortality risk in middle-aged and older patients with hip fractures. Specifically, patients with an RDW greater than 13.6% had 2.889 times higher 3-month mortality risk, 2.906 times higher 6-month mortality and 2.217 times higher 12-month mortality risk than those with an RDW less than 13.6%.
These findings suggest that RDW has predictive value for short-term mortality risk in middle-aged and older patients with hip fractures. This is consistent with previous studies that have found RDW to be a marker of mortality risk in a variety of disease states, including chronic heart failure, community-acquired pneumonia, hypertension, and stroke [19, 22,23,24].
To date, there are some studies examined the relationship between RDW and mortality of the middle-aged and older adults. In Cauthen’s study on the relationship between RDW and mortality rate in chronic heart failure, 6159 chronic heart failure patients were divided into three groups based on their RDW levels: ≤ 13.5%, 13.5-14.9%, and RDW > 14.9%. The results confirmed that with every 1% increase in RDW, the mortality risk increased by 17% [25]. In Braun’s study on the relationship between RDW and prognosis of community-acquired pneumonia, 3815 cases were grouped into RDW ≤ 15.0% and RDW > 15.0%, with a 3-month mortality rate of 16.83% and 38.07% [14], respectively. The difference was statistically significant [14]. In the study on the relationship between RDW and 5-year mortality risk among hospitalized elderly patients, 122 elderly individuals aged over 75 were divided into four groups based on their RDW levels: < 13.75%, 13.75-14.65%, 14.65-16.32%, and > 16.32% [26]. The results showed that the mortality risk in the group with RDW > 16.32% was 2.24 times higher than that in the group with RDW < 13.75% [26]. In Patel’s meta-analysis on the relationship between RDW and mortality risk in middle-aged and elderly individuals, the RDW values of 8178 individuals over 45 years old were divided into five groups: < 12.6%, 12.6-13.0%, 12.3-13.4%, 13.4-14.0%, and > 14.0% [27]. The results confirmed that the mortality rate increased sequentially in each group, and found that with every 1% increase in RDW, the mortality risk increased by 22% [27]. Garbharran’s study on predicting risk factors for mortality in hip fracture patients using the Charlson comorbidity index confirmed that the higher the index, the higher the RDW values, and the greater the risk of death [13]. They found that with every 1% increase in RDW, the 1-year mortality risk increased by 13% [13].
While these findings are promising, there are several limitations to our study. First, the sample size was relatively small, and larger studies are needed to confirm our findings. Second, we did not have information on some potentially important factors that may influence mortality risk, such as preoperative and post-operative functional status and other comorbidities. Third, we did not have information on the cause of death, which could provide important insights into the underlying mechanisms by which RDW predicts mortality risk.
Conclusions
In conclusion, RDW contributes to the prognosis of short-term mortality in hip fractures, and the greater the width of red blood cell distribution, the higher the risk of death. RDW is a simple and inexpensive blood test that could potentially be used to identify high-risk patients and guide clinical decision-making. However, further research is needed to confirm our findings and to better understand the underlying mechanisms by which RDW predicts mortality risk.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due [REASON WHY DATA ARE NOT PUBLIC] but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Catherine B, Johnston M et al. Osteoporosis in older Adults.[J].The medical clinics of North America,2020,104(5):873–84. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.mcna.2020.06.004
Manuela C. Giulia, The role of diet in osteoporotic fracture healing: a systematic review. [J]. Current osteoporosis reports,2020,18(3):138–47. 10.1007/sIF: 2.9 Q1 B2 11914-020-00573-8
Barron RL, Oster G, Grauer A et al. Determinants of imminent fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis[J].Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of Cooperation between the European foundation for osteoporosis and the National osteoporosis foundation of the USA,2020,31(11):2103–11.
Xia WB, He SL, Xu L, et al. Rapidly increasing rates of hip fracture in Beijing, China[J]. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(1):125–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/jbmr.519
Tian W, Wu J, Tong T et al. Diabetes and risk of post-fragility hip fracture outcomes in elderly patients [J].Int J Endocrinol. 2020;2020:8146196. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1155/2020/8146196
Wang PW, Yao XD, Zhuang HF, et al. Mortality and related risk factors of fragile hip fracture. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(10):2462–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/os.13417
Shigemoto K, Sawaguchi T, Horii T, et al. Multidisciplinary care model for geriatric patients with hip fracture in Japan: 5-year experience. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142(9):2205–14. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00402-021-03933-w
Dawod MS, Alisi MS, Saber YO, et al. Characteristics of elderly hip fracture patients in Jordan: A multicenter epidemiological study. Int J Gen Med. 2022;15:6591–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2147/IJGM.S373313. Published 2022 Aug 13.
Marom O, Paz I, Topaz G, et al. Red cell distribution width-A mortality predictor in older adults with proximal femoral fracture. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022;100:104623. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.archger.2022.104623
Harstedt M, Rogmark C, Sutton R et al. Impact of comorbidity on 6-month hospital readmission and mortality after hip fracture surgery. [J] Injury 2015,46(4):713–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.024
Li SG, Sun TS, Liu Z et al. Factors influencing postoperative mortality one year after surgery for hip fracture in Chinese elderly population. [J]. Chin Med J 2013,126(14):2715–9.
Keita M, Seiya J, Takehiko T. Mortality after hip fracture in Japan: the role of nutritional status. [J]. J Orthop Surg 2010,18(3):265–70. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1177/230949901001800301
Garbharran U, Chinthapalli S, Hopper I, et al. Red cell distribution width is an independent predictor of mortality in hip fracture. [J] Age Ageing. 2013;42:258–61. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/ageing/afs176
Braun E, Kheir J, Mashiach T et al. Is elevated red cell distribution width a prognostic predictor in adult patients with community acquired pneumonia? [J]. BMC Infect Dis 2014, 14:129. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/1471-2334-14-129
Salvagno GL, Sanchis-Gomar F, Picanza A, et al. Red blood cell distribution width: A simple parameter with multiple clinical applications. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2015;52(2):86–105. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3109/10408363.2014.992064
Nguyen BTT, Tran DNA, Nguyen TT, et al. The association between red blood cell distribution width and mortality risk after hip fracture: A Meta-Analysis. Med (Kaunas). 2024;60(3):485. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/medicina60030485. Published 2024 Mar 14.
Lippi G, Plebani M. Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and human pathology. One size fits all. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014;52(9):1247–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1515/cclm-2014-0585
Fava C, Cattazzo F, Hu ZD, et al. The role of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) in cardiovascular risk assessment: useful or hype? Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(20):581. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.21037/atm.2019.09.58
Ma FL, Li S, Li XL, et al. Correlation of red cell distribution width with the severity of coronary artery disease: a large Chinese cohort study from a single center. [J] Chin Med J. 2013;126(6):1053–7.
Nunez J, Nunez E, Rizopoulos D, et al. Red blood cell distribution width is longitudinally associated with mortality and anemia in heart failure patients. [J] Circulation J. 2014;78(2):410–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1253/circj.cj-13-0630
Li Y, Lin J, Wang P et al. Effect of time factors on the mortality in brittle hip fracture. [J] joernal of orthopaedic surgery and research.2014,9:37. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/1749-799X-9-37
Vaya A, Rivera L, Espriella R et al. Red blood cell distribution width and erythrocyte deformability in patients with acute myocardial infarction. [J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2015,59(2):107–14. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3233/CH-131751
Hu Z, Sun Y, Wang Q et al. Red blood cell distribution width is a potential prognostic index for liver disease. [J]. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013,51(7):1403–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2217/bmm-2021-0364
Vaya A, Hernandez V, Rivera L, et al. Red blood cell distribution width in patients with cryptogenic stroke. [J]. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2015;21(3):241–5. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1159/000527504
Cauthen CA, Tong W, Jain A et al. Progressive rise in red cell distribution width is associated with disease progression in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure. [J]. J Card Fail 2012,18(2):146–52. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.10.013
Martinez-Velilla N, Ibanez B, Cambra K et al. Red blood cell distribution width, Multimorbidity, and the risk of death in hospitalized older patients. [J] Age (Dordr) 2012,34(3):717–23. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11357-011-9254-0
Patel KV, Semba RD, Ferrucci L et al. Red blood cell distribution width and the risk of death in middle-aged and older adults. [J]. Arch Intern Med 2009,169(5):515–23. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.11
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Hongyi Zhu for providing guidance and for modifying the study design and content.
Funding
Declaration.
This study was supported by Major Project of Health Research for Young and Middle-aged Scientists in Fujian Province (2022ZQNZD015), Clinical project of school management project of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (XB2023197), Jinjiang Municipal Hospital (Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital Fujian) Science and Technology Project (2023LC01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
X.L., and J.Z., drafted and conceived the initial manuscript. Y.Z., L.L., and Z.L. provided the essential assistant for our final manuscript. X.L., and J.Z. drew the figures and arranged the tables. H.Z., X.H., and Z.W. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Jinjiang Municipal Hospital (jjsyyyxll-2022110). This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Xf., Zheng, Yq., Lin, L. et al. Red blood cell distribution width is a short-term mortality predictor in middle-aged and older adults with hip fracture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 26, 261 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12891-025-08499-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12891-025-08499-x