Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of quantitative synthesis

From: Unveiling the link: highly porous tantalum-augmented implants and periprosthetic joint infection in revision total knee arthroplasty—a systematic review and meta-analysis

 

Pooled effect size

95% CI

P-value

Model

I2 index

Q/df

Publication bias (Egger’s P-value)

Related figures

PJI rate after rTKA with tantalum

Rate = 8.1%

6.6%–9.9%

-

Fixed effect

0.0

0.6

Yes (0.008*)

(Fig. 2)

(Fig. 3)

Comparing the PJI rate between tantalum and none-TA group after rTKA

OR = 0.67

0.10–4.34

0.67

Fixed effect

0.0

0.2

No (0.86)

(Fig. 4)

PJI rate after rTKA in septic cases (re-infection)

Rate = 15.7%

11.7%–20.7%

-

Fixed effect

35.5

1.5

No (0.44)

(Fig. 5)

Comparing the PJI rate between the tantalum and none-Ta group after rTKA in septic cases (re-infection)

Not applicable

  1. CI confidence interval, rTKA Revision total knee arthroplasty, OR Odds ratio
  2. *Statistically significant p-value