Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment result based on Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS)

From: Unveiling the link: highly porous tantalum-augmented implants and periprosthetic joint infection in revision total knee arthroplasty—a systematic review and meta-analysis

No

Study author and year

Quality assessment (Newcastle–Ottawa Scale)

Score

Overall quality

Selection

Comparability

Outcome/exposure

  

1

Chalmers 2021

**

*

**

5

Medium

2

Rajgopal 2021

*

*

**

4

Low

3

Erivan 2021

***

*

**

6

Medium

4

Abdelaziz 2020

****

*

***

8

High

5

Abdelaziz 2019

****

*

***

8

High

6

Rajgopal 2019

**

 

**

4

Low

7

Panda 2019

**

 

***

5

Medium

8

Burastero 2018

****

*

***

8

High

9

Kukreja 2018

*

 

**

3

Low

10

Bohl 2018

***

**

***

8

High

11

Sandiford 2017

***

**

**

8

High

12

Girerd 2016

**

**

***

7

High

13

Potter 2016

**

**

*

5

Medium

14

Boureau 2015

*

 

**

3

Low

15

Bédard 2015

**

**

*

5

Medium

16

Brown 2015

***

**

***

8

High

17

Kamath 2015

***

*

**

6

Medium

18

De Martino 2015

***

*

***

7

High

19

Derome 2014

***

 

***

6

Medium

20

Jensen 2014

**

*

**

5

Medium

21

Villanueva-Martínez 2013

***

*

**

6

Medium

22

Rao 2013

**

*

***

6

Medium

23

Fosco 2013

**

*

***

6

Medium

24

Schmitz 2013

***

 

***

6

Medium

25

Panni 2013

*

*

*

3

Medium

26

Lachiewicz 2012

*

*

***

5

Medium

27

Howard 2011

***

*

***

7

High

28

Long 2009

***

*

**

6

Medium

29

Meneghini 2008

***

*

**

6

Medium

30

Radnay 2006

  

*

1

Low

  1. *indicates the number of stars each study received in each assessment domain